ARCHITECTURAL COMPONENT IN THE TEXTBOOK “ART” (THE EXPERT ASSESSMENT METHOD)
Abstract
The article is devoted to use the expert assessment method of the architectural component of the textbook “Art” (by O.A. Komarovska et al.).
It is emphasized on the importance of the art of architecture in the aesthetic education of schoolchildren, which is carried out primarily at art lessons. This requires appropriate scientific and methodological materials, including textbooks. Problems of their quality are of great scientific and practical interest.
To solve these problems, there is a need of teachers’ feedback who use textbooks in their work. The expert assessment method provides the opportunity for effective testing of the textbook. According to the purpose of the study, based on the analysis of scientific sources, the expert assessment method of the art of architecture was determined. The questionnaire for experts has been developed, which reflects the criteria of aesthetic education and the tasks set by the authors of the textbook.
The article describes the course of the survey, outlines its indicators. As a result, it was revealed which features of the presentation of educational material in the textbook received more support from experts, and vice versa. The examples of expert comments that can be considered as a methodological basis for improving the writing of similar textbooks in the future are given. The attention is drawn to certain contradictions, such as between the scientific style of presentation of the material, the excessive amount of information in some textbooks and the possibility of their perception by students.
The results of the study confirmed the feasibility of expert assessment of educational and methodological literature. The obtained indicators showed teachers and scholars’ positive attitude towards the presentation of the art of architecture in this textbook. According to their assessments and wishes, the ways of improvement and diversification of methods of aesthetic education of schoolchildren are determined.
References
Artsyshevskyi, R. A. (n.d.) Kryterii otsinky zmistu shkilnykh pidruchnykiv [Criteria for evaluating the content of school textbooks]. Retrieved from: http://ipvid.org.ua/upload/iblock/cc8/cc8e3d8b949bc2280e7f178c47cf5392.pdf/
Bekh, I. D. (2018). Osobystist na shliakhu do dukhovnykh tsinnostei [Personality on the way to spiritual values]. Kyiv-Chernivtsi: «Bukrek».
Komarovska, O. A., Myropolska, N. Ye., Nychkalo, S. A., Rudenko, I. V. (2018). Mystetstvo. Pidruchnyk dlia 10 (11) klasu zakladiv zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Art. Textbook for 10 (11) grades of general secondary education]. Kharkiv: Ranok.
Kyverialg, A. A. (1980). Metody issliedovaniia v profiessionalnoi piedagogikie [Research methods in professional pedagogy]. Tallinn: Valgus.
Markovska, M. (2021). Yakymy maiut buty pidruchnyky – porady vid finskykh ekspertiv [What should be the textbooks – advice from Finnish experts]. Retrieved from: https://nus.org.ua/articles/yakymy-mayut-buty-pidruchnyky-porady-vid-finskyh-ekspertiv//
Myropolska, N. Ye. (2021). Khudozhni tsinnosti v zhyttievomu prostori starshoklasnykiv: do postanovky problemy [Artistic values in the living space of high school students: to the problem]. Mystetstvo ta osvita [Art and Education], 1(99), 10-14.
Mystetstvo. Prohrama dlia zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv. 10 – 11 klasy. Riven standartu / Profilnyi riven [Art. The program for secondary schools. 10-11 Grades. Standard level / Profile level]. Retrieved from: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/osvita/zagalna-serednya-osvita/navchalni-programi/navchalni-programi-dlya-10-11-klasiv/
Mykhailova, L. M. (2018). Estetychno tsinnisnyi rozvytok osobystosti v navchalno-vykhovnomu prostori zakladu osvity [Aesthetically valuable development of personality in the educational space of an educational institution]. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo «Tochka».
Nikolai, H. Yu. (2013). Metodolohichni poshuky u sferi mystetskoi osvity [Methodological research in the field of art education]. Aktualni pytannia mystetskoi osvity ta vykhovannia, 1, 3-17.
Pavlyk, N. P. (2016). Zmist i prohrama ekspertnoho otsiniuvannia roli neformalnoi osvity u fakhovii pidhotovtsi maibutnikh sotsialnykh pedahohiv [Content and program of expert evaluation of the role of non-formal education in professional training of future social pedagogues]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Pedahohichi nauky, 1(83), 102-106.
Padalka, H. M., & Zaitseva, A. V. (2020). Kulturolohichni vymiry proektyvnoho modeliuvannia mystetskoi osvity [Culturological dimensions of projective modelling of art education]. Kultura i suchasnist: almanakh, 1, 3-6.
Panchenko, A. H. (2011). Ekspertne otsiniuvannia metodychnoi roboty v zahalnoosvitnomu navchalnomu zakladi. [Expert assessment of methodical work in a secondary school]. Osvitolohichnyi dyskurs, 1(3), 168-176.
Sysoieva, S. O., & Krystopchuk, T. Ye. (2013). Metodolohiia naukovo-pedahohichnykh doslidzhen [Methodology of scientific and pedagogical research]. Rivne: Volynski oberehy.
Sytnyk, D. V. (2011). Otsiniuvannia motyvatsiinoho, zmistovoho i protsesualnoho komponentiv pidruchnyka zasobamy anketuvannia [Assessment of motivational, semantic and procedural components of the textbook by means of questionnaires]. Problemy suchasnoho pidruchnyka, 11, 95-101.
Fedorova, N. F. (2017). Pro pedahohichnu ekspertyzu [On pedagogical examination]. Osvita ta rozvytok obdarovanoi osobystosti, 4(59), 14–22.
ISSN 
ISSN 
