EMOTIONAL PERCEPTION OF THE WORLD BY PERSONALITY IN A PHILOSOPHICAL SENSE
Abstract
The article highlights the problem of an individual’s emotional perception of the world in a philosophical sense. The purpose of the study is to highlight the problem of an individual’s emotional perception of the world in a philosophical sense. Following the goal, the tasks of analyzing domestic and philosophical sources and studying the genesis of the problem of emotional perception of the world by an individual in philosophy at various stages of the development of humanity and social formations are solved. To solve the research tasks, the methods of analysis of scientific sources, comparison, and study of experience, as well as systematization and generalization of materials on the research problem, are used. An individual’s emotional perception of the world is an essential aspect of modern philosophical science as a methodological basis for pedagogical research on the specified problem. It has been proven that the emotional perception of the world significantly influences an individual’s outlook, including a cognitive component and an emotional one. This means that the emotional sphere of human existence primarily determines the perception of the world. Emotions affect a person’s attitude to the world, other people, and themselves. Perception of the world is defined as a constant dynamic process by which a person receives, processes, and interprets information about the world, environment, people, and being. Each person has a unique experience during his life, determined by his emotional perception of the world, emotional reactions to certain phenomena, events, etc.
The contribution to the development of the theory of emotional perception of the world by the personality of the philosophers of antiquity, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, German classical philosophy, analytical philosophy, evolutionary philosophy, existentialism, phenomenology, postmodernism, irrationalism, humanism, geopolitics of emotions, posthumanism is analyzed and summarized.
The practical significance of the article is that its materials can be used in the organization of preschool education institutions, during the training of educators and psychologists, and in conducting pedagogical practices of students.
References
Aquinas, F. (1089). Summa Theologiae: A Concise. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
Aristotle. (2024). The Complete Works Kindle Edition. USA: ATN Classic.
Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman Critical Theory. In: Banerji D. & Paranjape M. (Eds.). Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures (pp. 13–32). New Delhi: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. A. (2019). Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities Theory. Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486
Brentano F. (1975). On the several senses of being in Aristotle. California: University of California Press.
Brentano, F. (1973). The Foundation and Construction of Ethics. New York: Humanities Press.
Brentano, F. (1981). The Theory of Categories. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Clarke, B. (2008). Posthuman Metamorphosis: Narrative and Systems. New York: Fordham University Press.
Darwin, C. (2009). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Descartes. R. (1996). The Passions of the Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fukuama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2005). My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Theophrastus. (2018). The Moral Characters of Theophrastus. UK: Hard Press.
Akvinskyi, T. (2003). Komentari do Aristotelevoi “Polityky”. [Commentaries on Aristotle’s “Politics”]. (2nd ed.) Kyiv: Osnovy.
Hobbs, T. (2000). Leviafan, abo Sut, budova i povnovazhennia derzhavy tserkovnoi i tsyvilnoi [Leviathan, or the essence, structure and powers of the ecclesiastical and civil state]. Kyiv: Dukh i litera.
Hryhorkiv, I. R. (2008). Aksiolohichni vymiry suchasnoi naukovoi kartyny svitu [Axiological dimensions of the modern scientific picture of the world] (PhD Abstract, Chernivtsi).
Kremen, V. H. (2010). Filosofiia liudynotsentryzmu v osvitnomu prostori [The philosophy of human-centeredness in the educational space]. Kyiv: Tovarystvo “Znannia” Ukrainy.
Muazi, D. (2018). Heopolityka emotsii. Yak kultury strakhu, prynyzhennia ta nadii zminiuiut svit [Geopolitics of emotions. How cultures of fear, humiliation, and hope change the world]. Kyiv: Brait Star Pablishynh.
Nitsshe, F. (1910). Tak movyv Zaratustra: Knyha dlia vsikh i dlia nikoho [Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and No One]. Kolomyia: Halytska nakladnia Yakova Orenshtaina.
Nitsshe, F. (2002). Po toi bik dobra i zla. Henealohiia morali [On the other side of good and evil. Genealogy of moralit]. Lviv: Litopys.
Saukh, P. Yu. (2003). Filosofiia [Philosophy]. Zhytomyr: Vydavnytstvo Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu.
Spenser, H. (1997). Syntetychna filosofiia [Synthetic philosophy]. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr.
Turenko, V. E. (2023). Rannia hretska filosofiia: refleksii pro polityku i pravo [Early Greek philosophy: Reflections on politics and law]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.
Fromm, E. (2020). Maty abo buty? [To have or to be?]. Kharkiv: Klub simeinoho dozvillia.
Chernova, L. P. (2011). Sotsialno-filosofska refleksiia suchasnoi naukovoi kartyny svitu. [Socio-philosophical reflection of the modern scientific picture of the world]. (PhD Abstract, Kyiv).
Yurkevych, P. D. (1860). Serdtse i eho znachenie v dukhovnoi zhizni cheloveka po ucheniiu slova Bozhiia [Heart and its meaning in the spiritual life of a person according to the teachings of the word of God]. Trudy Kievskoi dukhovnoi akademii, 1(2), 63-118.
Yurkevych, P. D. (1979). Tvory [Works]. Vinnipeh: Vyd. Kolehii Sv. Andreia.
ISSN 
ISSN 
