Safe Educational Environment as a Priority of Personality Socialization in Modern Realities
Abstract
The article highlights the key challenges facing contemporary Ukrainian society, underscoring the need to ensure a safe educational environment. The role and significance of such an environment are emphasized as strategic priorities for socializing individuals, fostering civic responsibility, and maintaining learners’ psychosocial well-being. An analysis of regulatory documents governing the creation and functioning of a safe environment in educational institutions is conducted, with particular attention to their substantive focus and practical orientation.
The aim of the article is to investigate the theoretical foundations and practical aspects of forming a safe educational environment as a key factor in the development of modern educational institutions. The study employs methods of theoretical analysis of national and international scholarly works, examination of regulatory documents, analysis, synthesis, generalization, systematization, and the method of scientific transfer – applying theoretical provisions to educational practice.
The approaches of foreign and domestic researchers who conceptualize the educational environment as a crucial component in shaping an individual's educational trajectory and developing learners' personal potential are examined. It is established that the structure and quality of the educational environment are determined by the interaction of external (social, informational, and security-related) and internal (organizational, pedagogical, and psychological) factors. The key conditions for the formation and development of a safe educational environment are outlined, and the principles underlying its functioning amid contemporary socialization challenges are identified.
The provisions of the Concept of a Safe Educational Environment and the Code of a Safe Educational Environment which constitute the regulatory basis for safety assurance in education are analyzed. An authorial interpretation of the term “safe educational environment” is proposed, taking into account contemporary approaches to pedagogical, social, informational, and physical safety. The ecological dimension of safety and the informational components of the educational space are considered, with emphasis on their impact on the quality of the educational process and participants' psychological comfort during educational interaction.
References
Bodrova, I., Chernukha, N., Vasylyeva-Khalatnykova, M., Bakulina, O., Binytska, K., Kostenko, D., & Tarnavska, T. (2023). Research on motivation for the development of professional self-determination. Revista Românească pentru Educație Multidimensională, 15(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.2/731
Chuiko, O., & Fedorenko, O. (2020). Levels of social integration of internally displaced persons in the host community. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 2, 7–16.
Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.745047
Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/NODTCT?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Osher, D., Poirier, J., Jarjoura, R., Brown, R., & Kendziora, K. (2014). Avoid simple solutions and quick fixes: Lessons learned from a comprehensive districtwide approach to improving student behavior and school safety. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 5. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu
Bobrovskyi, M. V., Horbachov, S. I., & Zaplotynska, O. O. (2019). Rekomendatsii do pobudovy vnutrishnoi systemy zabezpechennia yakosti osvity u zakladi zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Recommendations for building an internal system of quality assurance in general secondary education institutions]. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba yakosti osvity.
Danyliuk, I. V., & Lytvyn, S. V. (2024). Intehratsiia natsionalnykh ta osvitnikh tradytsii z yevropeiskymy standartamy pidhotovky [Integration of national and educational traditions with European standards of training]. In V. H. Panka (Ed.), Profesijna pidhotovka psykholohiv v Ukraini: stratehichni zavdannia: Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Round Table (April 23, 2024) (pp. 8–12). Kyiv: UNMC praktychnoi psykholohii i sotsialnoi roboty. Retrieved from https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/740900/1/2024_04_23_NAPS_Tes_new.pdf
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro povnu zahalnu seredniu osvitu» [Law of Ukraine “On Complete General Secondary Education”]. (2020). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/463-20#Text
Kontseptsiia bezpeky zakladiv osvity [Concept of Safety of Educational Institutions]. (2023). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/301-2023-%D1%80#Text
Sovhira, S., & Braslavska, O. (2022). Osvita dlia staloho rozvytku yak osnova formuvannia ekolohichnoi kultury maibutnikh fakhivtsiv [Education for sustainable development as a basis for forming the ecological culture of future specialists]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu, 6, 13–23.
Tsiuman, T. P., & Boichuk, N. I. (2018). Kodeks bezpechnoho osvitnoho seredovyshcha [Code of Safe Educational Environment]. Kyiv: Ukrainskyi fond «Blahopoluchchia ditei». Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/zagalna_serednya/protidia-bulingu/21kbos.pdf
Chuiko, O., & Hladyshko, Ye. (2022). Zmina kontekstu pedahohichnoi vzaiemodii yak umova orhanizatsii bezpechnoho osvitnoho seredovyshcha v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Change of pedagogical interaction context as a condition for organizing a safe educational environment under martial law]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriia “Sotsialna robota”, 1(8), 57–62. Retrieved from https://visnyk.soch.robota.knu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/165/125
ISSN
ISSN 