PEDAGOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF THE QUALITY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2308-3778-2022-26-1-226-235Keywords:
diagnostic complex, pedagogical monitoring, pedagogical diagnostics, early childhood, quality of educationAbstract
Relevance of the theme of the article is determined by the role of pedagogical diagnostics in the assessment of the quality of early childhood education. The author defines the appropriateness of using an integrated approach to the assessment of the quality of early childhood education. The aim of the article is to identify and explain the components of the diagnostic complex for assessing the quality of early childhood education.
Based on the analysis of the research, we made a comparison of two understandings: pedagogical diagnostics and pedagogical monitoring. The common feature between pedagogical diagnostics and pedagogical monitoring is that they are focused on examining the quality of functioning of pedagogical systems. According to the principles, rules, diagnostic tools for carrying out diagnostic activities, pedagogical monitoring acquires the characteristics of a diagnostic system, and pedagogical diagnostics is built into the system of monitoring. The author believes that pedagogical diagnostics is closer to the essence of pedagogical phenomena and processes, their actual manifestation as the diagnostic methods and procedures are used to “immerse” the subject of diagnostics in the reality of pedagogical reality. This article also analyzes the components of the system of pedagogical diagnostics.
In order to evaluate the quality of early childhood education, the diagnostic tools in the form of a diagnostic complex are proposed to play the role of a system-activating factor. Accordingly, the components of the diagnostic complex for assessing the quality of education for young children are the parameters of assessment of education quality, namely: objective; resource potential of the educational institution; implementation of the educational process; and productive. These parameters need to be adjusted according to the appropriate diagnostic methods and techniques.
References
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2021). Bazovyi komponent doshkilnoi osvity (Derzhavnyi standart doshkilnoi osvity) [The basic component of preschool education (State standard of preschool education)]. New edition. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/rizne/2021/12.01/Pro_novu_redaktsiyu%20B
Kremen, V. H. (Ed.). (2008). Entsyklopediia osvity [Encyclopedia of education]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Ingenkamp, K. (1991). Pedagogicheskaia dianostika [Pedagogical diagnostics].
Haluziak, V. M., & Kholkovska, I. L. (2015). Pedahohichna diahnostyka [Pedagogical diagnostics]. Vinnytsia: TOV «Nilan LTD».
Yevtukh, M. B., Luzik, E. V., & Dybkova, L. M. (2010). Innovatsiini metody otsiniuvannia navchalnykh dosiahnen [Innovative methods of evaluating educational achievements]. Kyiv: KNEU.
Kovalenko, O. V. (2021). Diahnostuvannia pedahohiv yak osnovna zasada metodychnoho suprovodu orhanizatsii osvitnomu protsesu v zakladi doshkilnoi osvity. [Diagnostics of teachers as the main basis of methodical support of the organization of the educational process in institutions of preschool education]. Pedahohichna osvita: teoriia i praktyka. Psykholohiia. Pedahohika, 36(2).
National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. (2020). Kontseptsiia osvity ditei rannoho ta doshkilnoho viku [Concept of education of early and preschool children]. Kyiv: FOP Ferenets V.B.
Sofii, N., & Haida, Yu. (Eds.). (2019). Kryterii yakosti doshkilnoi osvity. Zvit za rezultatamy doslidzhennia v mezhakh mizhnarodnoho proiektu «Mizhnarodni kryterii yakosti doshkidbnykh osvitnikh prohram» [Quality criteria of preschool education. Report on the results of research within the framework of the international project “International quality criteria of non-harmful educational programs”]. Kyiv.
Matvieieva, O. O. (2016). Teoretychni i metodychni zasady pedahohichnoi diahnostyky yakosti osvity maibutnikh uchyteliv muzychnoho mystetstva v umovakh universytetu [Theoretical and methodological principles of pedagogical diagnostics of the quality of education of future music teachers at university]. (Doctoral dissertation, Kyiv).
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2020). Metodychni rekomendatsii z pytan formuvannia vnutrishnoi systemy zabezpechennia yakosti osvity u zakladakh doshkilnoi osvity [Methodological recommendations on the formation of an internal system for ensuring the quality of education in institutions of preschool education]. Retrieved from https://rada.info/upload/users_files/41042215/191f934b087b0a0bf499ce603f3f1e81.pdf
Uruskyi, V. (Ed.). (2013). Pedahohichna diahnostyka [Pedagogical diagnostics]. Retrieved from http://bcmc.kiev.ua/docs/peddiagnostika.pdf
Pidlasyi, I. P. (1998). Diahnostyka ta ekspertyza pedahohichnykh proektiv [Diagnostics and expertise of pedagogical projects]. Kyiv: Ukraina.
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2020). Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku provedennia monitorynhu yakosti osvity [On approval of the Procedure for monitoring the quality of education]. (Order No. 54, January 16). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0154-20#Text.
Rannii rozvytok dytyny. Yak rozvyvaietsia maliuk vid narodzhennia do trokh rokiv [Early child development. How a baby develops from birth to three years]. https://www.unicef.org/ukraine/media/13461/file/Early%20child%20development.pdf
Starosta, V. (2017). Pedahohichnyi monitorynh ta pedahohichna diahnostyka: sutnist i vzaiemozviazok poniat [Pedagogical monitoring and pedagogical diagnostics: the essence and interrelationship of concepts]. Naukovyi visnyk MNU imeni V. O. Sukhomlynskoho. Pedahohichni nauky, 4(59), 499–505.
Tsekhmistrova, H. S. (2002). Diahnostyka efektyvnosti navchalnoho protsesu u vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh [Diagnostics of the effectiveness of the educational process in higher educational institutions] (PhD Abstract, Kyiv).
Rankin, P. S., Staton, S., Potia, A. H., Houen, S., & Thorpe, K. (2022). Emotional quality of early education programs improves language learning: A within-child across context design. Child development, 93(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13811
Dong Guo, Yudan Wang, Yifan Liao, Jiaofeng Li, Xingyi Zhang, Zaifeng Gao, Mowei Shen, Jie He. (2022). Development of information integration in the visual working memory of preschoolers. Child development, 93(3). https:/doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13820.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Iryna Lutsenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 
ISSN 
