PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS OF EDUCATION OF ADOLESCENTS’ MEANINGFUL LIFE VALUES IN FAMILY
Abstract
The article deals with education of the adolescents’ meaningful life values in family. The concept of «meaningful life values» is defined as a system of generalized aspirations related to the person’s life, which in a developed form characterizes one’s spiritual and moral self-concept, self-search and appropriate lifestyle expressed in person’s behaviour, activities and communication.
It is found out that meaningful life values are freedom, love, dignity and tolerance. It is determined that meaningful life values are a fundamental characteristic of human existence, which determines a person’s ability to choose his or her being, to manage it, to feel independent and, at the same time, responsible for the results of activities. Love as a person’s highly sensual attitude towards people, to oneself that stimulates the development of personality’s meaningful life sphere. Dignity as a meaningful life value is determined by the value of human and the assessment of its significance and place in society. The understanding of tolerance as a meaningful life value in family is highlighted, as the presence of tolerance directly affects the coexistence of adults and children in family, solves the question of how each family member can realize their rights towards such meaningful life values as freedom, dignity and love without limiting oneself and others. The tolerance in family creates conditions for the development of each family member, recognition of the right to create their own life and acceptance of their life choices.
The pedagogical conditions of education of the adolescents’ meaningful life values in family are substantiated as the following: coordination of the adolescent’s meaningful life sphere, humanization of the educational environment of family, ethical mutual responsibility of family members, participation in training work.
The practical significance of the article is that its materials can be used in organizing educational work of general education institutions, training of teachers, psychologists and pedagogical practice of students.
References
Bekh, I. D. (2001). Humanistychna pedahohika: perypetii stanovlennia [Humanistic pedagogy: challenges of development]. Pedahohika tolerantnosti, 4(2), 21-24
Deklaratsiia i plan deistvii «Mir prigodnyi dlia zhizni detei», priiniatoi rezoliutsiei S-27/2 spetsialnoi sessiei Generalnoi Assamblei OON u 2002 [Declaration and Plan of Action «A world fit for children», adopted by resolution S-27/2 of the special session of the General Assembly UN in 2002]. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_b20/print1443179535843441.
Yliasov, F. (2013). Metodologiia resursnogo podkhoda k analizu trudovykh motivov i ustanovok [Methodology of the resource approach to the analysis of labour motives and attitudes]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, 5, 13-25.
Kleptsova, E. Yu. (2004). Psikhologiia i pedagogika tolerantnosti [Psychology and pedagogy of tolerance]. Moscow.
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [The Constitution of Ukraine]. (1996). Kyiv: Yurinkom.
Korsini, R., Auerbakh, A. (Eds.). (2003). Liubov [Love]. In Psikhologicheskaia entsiklopediia (pp. 368-369). Saint Petersburg.
Makgonigal, K. (2012). Sila voli. Kak razvit i ukrepit [Willpower. How to develop and strengthen]. Moscow: «Mann, Ivanov i Ferber».
Mei, R. (2001). Ekzistentsialnye osnovy psikhoterapii. Ekzistentsialnaia psikhologiia. Ekzistentsuia [Existential foundations of psychotherapy. Existential psychology. Existence]. Moscow: Aprel Press, Izd-vo EKSMO-Press.
Nova ukrainska shkola. Kontseptualni zasady reformuvannia serednoi shkoly [Nova ukrainska shkola. Konceptualni zasadi reformuvannia serednoi shkoli [The New Ukrainian School. Conceptual Principles of Secondary School Reform]. (2016). Kyiv: Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy.
Pohrebniak, S. (2008). Nehatyvna i pozytyvna svoboda v umovakh demokratychnoi pravovoi derzhavy [Negative and positive freedom in a democratic state governed by the rule of law]. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsionalnogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskoho, 21(60), 74-81.
Prohrama «Nova ukrainska shkola» v postupi do tsinnostei [The program «New Ukrainian School» in the progress of values]. (2020). Shkilnyi svit, 11-12(107-108), 90-119.
Sukhomlynska, O. V. (1996). Suchasni tsinnosti u vykhovanni: problemy, perspektyvy [Modern values in education: problems, prospects]. Shliakh osvity, 1, 24-27.
Sukhomlynska, O. V. (2015). Pro idei ta pidkhody do vykhovannia moralnosti: ukrainskyi pohliad [On ideas and approaches to the education of morality: The Ukrainian view]. Shkilnyi svit, 4 (708), 4-20.
Sukhomlynskyi, V. O. (1977). Vybrani tvory [Selected works]: Vol. 2. Kyiv: Radianska shkola.
Tertyshnyk, V. M. (2017). Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Scientific and practical commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Pravova yednist.
Fromm, E. (1992). Dusha cheloveka [The human soul]. Moscow: Respublika.
Yashchuk, I. P. (2001). Formuvannia zhyttievoi kompetentnosti osobystosti starshoklasnykiv zahalnoosvitnikh shkil Ukrainy [Formation of vital competence of the personality of high school students of comprehensive schools of Ukraine] (PhD dissertation. Kyiv.
Brimi, H. (2009). Academic instructors or moral guides? Moral education in America and the teacher’s dilemma. Clearing House. A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82 (3), 125-130.
Dailey, R. (2005). Confirmation and adolescent development: The relationship between parental confirmation and adolescent self-esteem, identity, and openness (Master’s thesis). University of California, Santa Barbara.
Josephson, M., Peter, V., & Dowd, T. (2001). Parenting to build character in your teen. Nebraska: Boys Town Press.
Kuperfish, Sh. (2005). Parental favoritism, self-esteem and locus of control (Master’s thesis). Alliant International University, San Francisco.
Schuitema, J., Dam, G., & Veugelers, W. (2008). Teaching strategies of moral education. A review Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 69-89.
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Teaching for ethical reasoning in liberal education. Liberal Education, 96(3), 32–37.
ISSN 
ISSN 
